National News
Nitish Katara case: Delhi High Court judge recuses from hearing convict’s plea seeking three-month parole
New Delhi: A Delhi High Court judge on Wednesday recused herself from hearing a plea by Vishal Yadav, serving life-term in the Nitish Katara murder case, seeking three-month parole to sell his property to arrange funds for his daughter’s education.
When the matter came up before Justice Mukta Gupta, she said the case be listed before another bench on 15 December. The judge did not give any reason for her recusal.
The matter was listed before this bench after the transfer of the previous judge who had asked the Delhi Police to file a status report after full verification of the facts.
The court had also sought response of Neelam Katara, mother of Nitish, on the plea and said that the notice be also served to witness Ajay Katara to present his case.
Yadav, in his plea, has said he was in custody and could not challenge the December 2014 order of the high court by which his appeal was dismissed in the murder case and sought a three-month parole to engage a lawyer and make other arrangements to exercise his legal and constitutional rights.
He has claimed there was no one else to look after his daughter, studying in Class X, for her education and that he has to dispose of his property in Ghaziabad’s Vaishali to arrange for funds for her studies and his litigation.
He also wished to meet his grandmother who was in an advanced stage of life, the plea said.
On 29 August, the Supreme Court had dismissed his plea seeking review of its verdict sending him to prison for 25 years.
The top court had earlier dismissed the appeals against their conviction in the case for the kidnapping of Katara from a marriage party on the intervening night of 16-17 February, 2002 before killing him for his alleged affair with Bharti Yadav, the sister of Vikas Yadav.
Bharti is the daughter of Uttar Pradesh politician DP Yadav who is in jail in connection with a murder case.
Katara was murdered as Vishal and Vikas Yadav did not approve of the victim’s affair with Bharti because they belonged to different castes, the lower court had said.
